Tag Archives: national data collection

Confused Yet?

***Fourth in a Series Highlighting the 116th Congressional session of federal overreaches in the name of education.

Anti Fed Ed Warriors, over the years we’ve had quite a bit thrown at us in order to confuse us. No where does this seem to reoccur more than Congress. Especially at the CCSS Machine’s direction.

During the past 3 articles, I’ve shown you the massive federal educratic overreaches into our homes, forcing a false ‘choice’ agenda, and, uniting with the (United Nations) UN’s STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and, Math) to basically do the same thing: data track us from cradle to grave. It’s not about academic education, it’s all about jobs and workforce training…just as the UN and the CCSS Machine have been plotting/carrying out.

Thank goodness, that part’s not confusing! So, what is confusing, you may be asking?

Two federal bills with different numbers from the SAME Chamber of Congress!
In the past, on my blog and writing for the
Patriot Institute, I shared with you the long used practice of Congress having ‘sister’ bills, but those would come from BOTH Chambers, not one. (*Note: Congress uses this system, from what I’ve seen in education research to accomplish one goal: get the agenda through from one side or the other.)

Every Congress member should know our position when it comes to fed led education!So, let’s see what these two bills are from the same Chamber.

HR 150 and HR 50:

HR 150, “Grant Reporting Efficiency and Agreements Transparency Act of 2019” aka GREAT Act (12 pages long)
HR 50, GREAT Act aka “Grant Reporting Efficiency and Agreements Transparency Act of 2019” (12 pages long)
Both are sponsored by Rep. Virginia Foxx of NC.
HR 150 has 15 co-sponsors, has had 1 roll call vote and is in the Senate already (Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs).
HR 50 has no co-sponsors, is in the House Committee of Oversight and Reform.

Of the 15 co-sponsors for HR 150, 7 are from the introduction (1/3/19), the others have cosponsored since then. Original House Representatives: Gomez (CA), Quigley and Kelly (IL), DesJarlais (TN), Palmer (AL), and Kilmer (WA). The other 8  Representatives are: Rouda and Harder (CA), Meadows (NC), Norman (SC), Axne (IA), Kline (VA), Stauber and Emmer (MN).

Before we look at the text of HR 150/HR 50, let me remind you of Rep. Foxx’s stance on ‘quality’ education:

What HR 150/50 Say and Do:

Warriors, here’s a list of what we can expect:

1) Either will modernize the federal government’s grant reporting system and ‘other purposes’. What this means is if you received a federal grant or are in a cooperative agreement with the federal government, you’re about to be more data tracked than ever before. How this can related to education is via all the grants, sub-grants, and cooperative agreements mandated in ESSA, Every Student Succeeds Act.


2) An imposition of data standards will be visited upon each recipient and participant of grants, sub-grants, and, cooperative agreements.
3) In charge of the imposition of data standards AND implementing data streams will be the Director of the Office and Budget Management. Why THAT director? To be in compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (31
7 U.S.C. 6101 note).
The purpose? From Page 2 “which includes the development of a ‘‘comprehensive taxonomy of standard definitions for core data elements required for managing Federal financial assistance awards’’ .
How this will play out for you and I is whatever data is taken it will be quicker, less burdensome for P3s (public private partnerships), and better manage us, at least as far as our data.

4) These bills will strengthen the federal government in oversight and management of all the grant recipients and cooperative partners.

5) Both bills will amend Subtitle V (5) of Title 31 of the United States Code by creating a brand new chapter titled “Data Standards for Grant Reporting”. Title 31 deals with money and finance, subtitle V deals with general assistance administration.
Look below at where Chapter 64 would land between:

Within this new chapter you’ll find that ‘core data elements’ mean they aren’t specific to what program, but are still required by the federal government for all or most of all the grants, awards, cooperative agreements, and sub-grants.

You’ll also learn that what the federal government defines as grants, sub-grants, awards, and cooperative agreements isn’t always in money form. As such, it’s up for grabs to be data tracked. While the federal government is setting these data standards, the States must comply. At the bare minimum, unique identifiers for federal awards and their groups will be tracked government wide.

How it is determined which federal agency set these data standards? The Executive agency which has the MOST activity!! What is this? Grade school games?!


Who gets tracked? Basically everybody.

Supposedly whatever data is collected is to be ‘fully searchable and machine readable’ as well as ‘non-proprietary’ overseen by ‘voluntary consensus standards bodies’.

All the while this is going on the U.S. Treasury will act as consultant. Other consultants could include any head of a federal agency (giving the awards), those receiving awards, the private sector experts (including privacy ones), and State/local governments.

6) Guiding all this data collection? The federal government. The federal government will explore new opportunities to involve modern technology in the data collection/sharing. All this is to take place with 2 years of the bills becoming law. Within 3 years, all future data collection/standards/sharing must be in full compliance.

7) On page 9, you’ll find one of those ‘other purposes’ coming to life. It’s called the Single Audit Act. This is where the ‘federal clearinghouse’ for data is dependent on the new Chapter 64 that HR150 and HR 50 put into place.

8) By 4 years after HR 150 and HR 50 become law, data is to be made public. It’s here that you’ll see that the Director of the Office Management and Budget determines ‘reasonable restrictions’ to personal and private data.

Is this determination at the federal government’s definition or of ‘We the People’?

Ah..the answer is whatever’s shareable by the Freedom of Information Act, is what can be shared in the future…

9) On the bottom of Page 10, you’ll find the Director and the Secretary of whichever federal agency gives the most grants, etc. set what data is ‘non proprietary’ or what isn’t. By  the last page of these bills you’ll find a classic federal government CYA statement about no new data which isn’t already fair game for the government will be used.

Warriors, if you’re wondering about the difference of ‘non proprietary’ data as far as the federal government, it means data they produced or generated. However, take into consideration that 9/10 of the data the government collects comes from proprietary (meaning your personal property) data/information.

Again, CONTEXT, Warriors. Think what Chapter 64 means for education. Think about the algorithms needs in those high-stake assessments or behavior interventions. Think about the biometrics involved.

Lastly, note that HR 150 has been slammed through the House and is in the Senate. This Bill needs to be killed. HR 50, needs to die in its Committee. Call, email, text, or use social media. These Bills, HR 150 and HR 50, are data raping pimps to be used by the federal government. Look at the future plans being made here!!!!

Related Resources:

1) To access the 2018 government tracking grant information from a citizen’s aspect (as well as where you’ll find the grant stream picture above), go here.
2) I tried to find a recent list of the top grant awarding federal agencies. The most recent I could find was 2010:

Closing:

Are you confused yet, as to how much the federal government means to track us from cradle to grave? We shouldn’t be, Bills like this exact pair are super dangerous. Let D.C. know you’re not going to allow this!!

My next article in this series will look at the educratic/data rape aspects for Medicaid, TANF, and everyday Moms.

 

Advertisements

A Matter of Trust?

To My Anti Fed Ed Warriors, it’s been SUCH a busy week of fighting against CCSS Machine.

This article will be short in words, but HUGE in audio content. Why? Warriors, it’s a matter of trust for all of us..

Trust between a citizen and their nation; trust between a parent and a child; AND keeping us ‘at the ready’ against the national data rape our government is committing DAILY!

Some of us who are STILL exposing the illegal activities of our government as part of the CCSS Machine, as well as the willingness of ANYONE else connected, see apathy among parents. WHY? How can we POSSIBLY afford the ‘luxury’ of apathy at this stage of our nation’s demise???!!

jeffersonwords

Parents, education IS the #1 ‘change agent’ by which to undermine our nation!
Data which is collected on our students (or all ages and all choices) is the #1 way to control them! Data is the #1 way to control the nation..it’s economy AND it’s direction.

Warriors, take an hour and a half to listen to my recent SC presentation where we covered not only data rape, but the 6 other things REAL education shouldn’t include!
A big thanks to the Concerned Voters of Pickens County, South Carolina.

formerdream(image by @commoncorediva; clipart by ClipArt Library)

However, data rape isn’t our only area where we should be on alert. We need to check our trust level of the education system. With ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) embedded enough mandates that will align every single education choice known to us!

After listening to the SC recording, be sure to access the latest Women on the Wall Call about even MORE warnings for parents and taxpayers!)

Yet, we’re STILL sending our beloved children into this system. Parents who have gotten their kids out of the more traditional public system and placed them into an alternative, are finding that the SAME data rape, the SAME indoctrination, the SAME assessments are there are well. Warriors, THAT is the VERY goal of ESSA!

Why are we wondering why our kids come home confused about life, when we say we don’t want fed led ed, but we don’t bat an eye sending them there!

doubleviper
Our kids trust us, as their parents! Parents seem to still trust the schools. When schools steeped in indoctrination (which is against the very family entity) tell the students to think one way and we (dare) to say ‘No, we think this way.” WHAT ARE WE REALLY SHOWING OUR KIDS? If the students accept your blanket trust in the CCSS Machine system, then WHATEVER happens in THAT system will be what those students THINK you WANT them to be exposed to!!

Do you really WANT your child daily data raped? Do you really WANT your child assigned to a job path before they can truly decided what they DESIRE to do? Do you really WANT to see the government demand taxpayer money of YOURS to pay for BOTH these and MORE?

Remember, even home education is in danger every time early college/dual enrollment, internships, apprenticeships, virtual public schools, AP (Advanced Placement), IB (International Baccalaureate), ALL of the nationally-normed tests (especially ACT and SAT, GED, and CLEP).

We are ALLOWING our kids to face daily data rape for not simply undermining America, but aligning to the United Nations. Don’t think the data rape extends that far?! I urge you to go back and READ the evidence! A computer has the ability to track everything a student knows, thinks, and does. 

Below are the millions/billions of dollars being earmarked for
NATIONAL DATA COLLECTION in 2019. 
HR 6470 and S 3158 are simply a beginning point for Congress in relation to the Fiscal Year (FY) Finalized 2019 Budget. Both these Bills cover ONLY the Depts of Labor, HHS, Education, and ANY related Agency.

kjosquote

Related Information for where we are RIGHT now!

However, by knowing WHERE the money goes, we can track how it ends up in the FINALIZED version.
The fiscal Year 2019 begins 10/1/18.

Career Aligning Data Mining:
*From HR 6470, $6 million to enlarge and innovate the Workforce Quality Data Initiative (WQDI) uses personal, private data from those in post-secondary schools and the job market to streamline back down to the Student Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) used in any K-12th-grade education tracking system (all ed choices).

In S 3158, $6 million for WQDI is also set aside.

*YouthBuild (HR 6470: $92, 534,000/S 3158: $93,079,000

*Expanding Apprenticeships (dovetails directly into the new CTE law and Exec Order for expansion) HR 6470: $150 million/S 3158: $160 million

*State grants for One Stop Job Centers, National Data Systems, Vets, etc. HR 6470: $3.47 billion; S 3158: $3.5 billion

*Health Care Data collection S 3158: $21 million

*HR 6470’s Health Care Data Collection is lumped in with Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Admin. (SAMHA) funds for ‘early intervention’ evidence-based research), $1.4 billion

*HR 6470 Health Surveillance/Research (ties to the Freedom of Information Act) $467 million; Data Collection for Substance Abuse: $79 million. Similar to this in S 3158 is the $60.3 million in funds for Health Information Technology upgrades.

*In Education, NATIONAL DATA COLLECTION VIA “SAFE SCHOOLS” 
(HR 6470: $5.2 billion; S 3158: $5.3 billion)

*HR 6470 has $6.5 million set aside in education for the Census Bureau and Education Data, S 3158: $5 million

*Career Tech Ed (CTE) HR 6470, $1.9 billion (will use SLDS and WQDI among other DATA RAPE information)

S 3158 for CTE: $1.8 billion
Institutes for Educational Science (IES), US Dept. of Ed research arm totally dependent on massive amounts of data)

HR 6470: $613 million, S 3158: $615 million BOTH these amounts carry the mandate that they MUST connect Pre-K to adult education/workforce data.
From Voices Empowers research:

Most people believe that an IEP is only for students with special needs, as referenced in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). But the fact is, an IEP (Personalized Learning) will soon be, for every American citizen in this new P-20W system. P-20W meaning from prenatal through the workforce, and is a part of a much bigger plan. It is a controlled workforce for a controlled global economy.

When the money follows the child, state or federal Education Savings Acts (ESA)s, via government, regulated “School Choice”, the access point is established to reach every citizen, no matter what education choose is used.

To see the chokehold data has via IDEA funds in the context of ESSA, go here.

Closing:

Warriors, Parents, and Taxpayers, we HAVE to stop trusting a system which doesn’t serve us as We the People should be served! We MUST take our citizenship duties seriously! PROTECT your FAMILY now!

twainwords

 

US Ed’s Global Shakedown

Anti Fed Ed Warriors,

Recently I’ve shown you several globally overreaching agenda items which are showing up in our US Congress. As you know, I’ve asked “WHY?”. Why are our US taxpayer dollars going to fund programs and set laws which are NOT American made, nor citizen driven? Especially when it comes to education.

yesteryearsnews(Image source)

Warriors, as you can see by this vintage political cartoon, having American citizens pay for D.C.’s ‘extravagance’ is an age old issue. Now, why would I choose to insert ‘extravagance’?

After all, education is NOT a luxury..it’s a privilege. I chose the ‘e’ word to make a point. American citizens are supposed to be the ones who influence Congress to create legislation, not lobbyists, corporations, or, global groups.

Yet, we’ve seen in the War Vs the Core just how easily We, the People, are dismissed. Congress is being extravagant with its power.

Wait Lynne, you said education is a privilege. Isn’t it actually a ‘right’? That depends Warriors. Are you thinking American or globally?

Global rhetoric has preached for years that education is a right and therefore MUST be given. The only problem with this logic is what is mandated (or in this case a ‘must’) is also controlled.

In the case of the CCSS Machine’s domain over globally based education, look at HOW controlled America’s education has become. It’s also become even MORE controlled by global forces. Yet, We the People will be expected to pick up the global-to-fed-led bill every time.

The classic thought concerning education in America (as elsewhere) was that by having education treated as a privilege, everyone involved got way more bang for their taxpayer dollar.

Think about it, teachers wanted to teach because they were encouraged, not forcibly controlled. Students were inspired to learn because they knew going to school was a step in the right direction, not a step to some assessment mandated job.

The CCSS Machine has murdered any joy, privilege, or enjoyment associated with education. Both for teachers AND students.

The ‘un-intended’ victims? The families and taxpayers.
Our compliance is not a choice, it, too, is a controlled mandate.
We have no say in the fact we do NOT wish to see our taxpayer dollars fund globally based Congressional bills.


The Latest Global Grab Bag:

From NC, August 2017, this screen shot from the Global Ready Implementation Rubric:

ncglobal17

 How committed to globalism is your State? Where I live (NC), is 100% committed. I’ve shared this with you many times* before here on my blog. The most recent commitments from the SBE (State Board of Education, where all political parties are involved), and the NC DPI (Dept. of Public Instruction). While we assume this only involves public schools of all kinds, this globalization in education reaches into private education, as well as homeschooling. How? Dual enrollment, AP courses, assessments, on-line or hybrid classes, extra curricular activities, and more.

*In the embedded link for NC global readiness, you’ll find many other States, ties to the UN (United Nations), UNESCO, The Asia Society, the united fronts of the NEA and AFT willing participating in the global shift in education, and so much more.

From the NEA (National Education Association) Foundation:

NEAglobalThis screen shot is from the NEA Foundation’s recent announcement for the latest Global Fellowships.
To access the Education First information, go here.
To see the Gates Foundation grants, they are here.

From the AFT’s (American Federation of Teachers) website:

aftglobal
To see the shift to the Fulbright Program, go here.
To see the Global Education Symposium information, look here.

From EI (Education International):
Warriors
, both the AFT and the NEA are affiliates of the EI. If you’ve not heard of this international organization, look at their requirements for affiliates/members.

eimember
To see the EI’s history, find it here.
To read the 2015 EI’s 7th World Congress on education, it’s located here.

From GAML (Global Alliance to Monitor Learning), this screen shot:

GAMLUIS
To see the GAML Task Forces, visit this page.
Warriors, most of data mining information can be found in the technical assistance pages for the UIS and GAML. Since both of these are arms of the UN, the ultimate location for the data is the United Nations. To get a global tidal wave of data to the UN, you have to have data partners. You’ll be able to access all kinds of education data tracks here.
GAML Related, from June 2017, my look at the Global Alliance to Monitor Learning .

From the CIES (Comparative and International Education Society):
This FL based international group targets higher education.
cies

To see the CIES Board of Directors, visit here. To see their Constitution and By-laws, go here. From the CIES 2017 Fall Symposium, a global list of organizations and educational opportunities. This meeting was held at George Mason University, so you’ll see the GMU in the website address.

Other Resources:

Global education related, from my fellow anti Fed Ed Warrior, Alison Hawver McDowell’s guide to the latest educratic buzzwords. Most of these will be included in the global shift from quality education to global workforce training.

If you missed this 2009 School Readiness paper for Global Education, you’ll see how it plays into our social structure.

In 2016, a report on the higher educated US citizens and their global readiness.

This Youth Index from the International Youth Foundation (IYF) includes American education among the globalization.

youthindex

Click here to see the complete American profile.
To see the complete list of CCSS Machine member partners for the IYF, go here.

If you missed this early 2017 EdWeek blog article about what the 5 goals of ‘global education’ are, you should read it. Weigh in where we are in American education now that 2017 is almost over.

Closing:

Warriors, as we close out yet another year of opposing the CCSS Machine, may you find a bit of rest. May your family be blessed. May you find the time to recharge your Anti Fed Ed ‘batteries’. We have a big road ahead in 2018. We’ll need all the truth we can amass to continue our mission of protecting our nation and its citizens from the educational assault. Thank you ALL for your continued support.
*******************************************
A Personal note to you, my followers.

From my humble home in NC, I wish you much joy and love. I’ll be taking a family break, beginning Dec. 19th. It’s been a roller coaster year and I’m finding that my first official Christmas without either of my parents alive, has its moments. I’ll be back here by 12/27.

OldDesignShop_ChristmasBlessingsPC