Tag Archives: deception

Education/Workforce: Springtime Edition

Spring has sprung in DC, alright. If you’ve been following my anti Fed Ed/global research information long, you are fully aware of the activities from Washington which have locked in the shift from academics to workforce.

So, my fellow Anti Fed Ed Warriors, what’s in fashion for Spring 2018 in the CCSS Machine’s line of education/workforce reform? Well, apparently dressing up the reform in spring colors. I guess that way it looks a bit more fashionable..and less conforming.

edworkprosper

Ahh, Warriors, isn’t it so pretty?! ‘Streamlined and straight jacketed’ just for our American taxpayers!

If you are not sure what PROSPER is, it is the U.S. House of Representative’s version of what the 1965 HEA (Higher Education Act) should be transformed into.

“PROSPER” stands for ‘Promoting Real Opportunity, Success, and, Opportunity through Education Reform’. It’s HR 4508, it’s key sponsor? Rep. Virginia Foxx (NC) who just happens to be the Chairwoman for the U.S. House of Representatives’ Education and Workforce Committee.

Her ‘design concept’ on all education? 

foxxed

As far as the ‘quality’ education in the CCSS Machine, you’ll find more worthiness in what lines the chicken coop floor than you will what’s being fashioned for higher education! Be it in the House OR the Senate.

Either version of the upcoming HEA Re-authorization (PROSPER Act or the Higher Education Innovation Act) will increase the conformity in the education reform. It will tie K-12 students (in all choices) to the CCSS Machine’s workforce standards in higher education. Either will increase the amount of ‘student data rape’ needed to feed the global workforce.

Warriors, we might as well as hand out these Brazilian kid-sized straight jackets for school uniforms and/or diplomas!

cutestraightjacket(*Note: The Brazilian show, Super Nanny created and used this (and other control toys) to spike viewership and point out there’s a better way out there to have a happy family. Source; see how successful the campaign worked by watching the roughly 2 minutes of video.)

In a similar context, we, as those opposed to federal control of education at any age, know that conformed, straight-jacketed workforce education is NOT the better way.

Ed/Work Thinks We Missed Some Things:

Yes, Warriors, the House’s Ed and Workforce Committee must assume we, as taxpayers. are totally clueless. Just last week the Committee published a blog article to show us what we may of missed about PROSPER.
In their article, it was revealed that We the People might of ‘missed’ how great PROSPER will be in 3 areas.
a) grading and assessing ALL higher education institutions, not just the ‘for profit’ (proprietary) ones.
b) how student debt and tuition can be decreased.
c) how the taxpayers lose out when student debt is high.

While it IS true that student debt and tuition are at ridiculously high levels, the obvious is MISSED by Ed/Workforce, not, We the People! How?! Get the government out of the student loan business, Duh! The government hoarding of student loans is awful.

It ramps up the ‘student data rape’ while it controls who can and cannot go to college. The ‘student data rape’ happens every single time a Career Tech Education, Career Track, or Career Pathway, a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and, Math) course is taken.  (there are several other names like “Future Ready”, “College and Career Readiness, etc.)  Be it in middle school, high school, extra curricular classes, dual enrollment, early college, and others.

The data is used against your student (or yourself if you are going back to school) to pigeon hole you to a prescribed course to pursue. Tying ‘success’ in any education choice BEFORE college is used to tie it to your student FAFSA (which is now mandatory to complete in some States). FAFSA has been re-written to ‘data rape’ families.

Warriors, by controlling both the money AND the education, a dangerous trap is being set for Americans. The CCSS Machine is seriously spinning all this as ‘making America better’ or increasing the job market. Which leads to economic gains. However, as we’ve learned, who really loses?! The citizens! They loose their freedom to choose what they wish to live, work, and, how to contribute to society. Citizens also loose when they are continually forced to pick up the bill for ‘free community college’.

The federal government has long been trying to instill a ‘nanny state’. ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) completed much of this type of alignment. How? It tied not only the WIOA (Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act) ‘education’ standards to K-12, it opened the door for birth to 1st in setting up workforce tracks. Don’t you remember Arne Duncan’s words about looking at the 2nd graders and knowing where they’d end up?!

2ndduncan
By ‘grading’ and assessing all higher education institutions, you’ll also seeing a big CCSS Machine spin on reality. Warriors, remember when ESSA stated that ALL education must be aligned to post-secondary readiness standards? Well, you have to align those post-secondary institutions! The ‘best’ way to force conformity?! Funding!

Closing:

No, Warriors, I do not thing we ‘missed’ anything about PROSPER. I think we totally ‘get it’. D.C. is so far entrenched with lies about their role in education, they have deceived themselves in this case.

As far as this Spring 2018 fashionable makeover for selling “PROSPER”, my advice is to skip it. No one needs springtime straight jackets. Quality education cannot be found in D.C., my followers. When it comes to ‘makeovers’ in education, D.C.’s a ‘knock off’.

Twelve Pains, Revisited

Warriors, it’s hard to believe that 2 Decembers ago, I was writing my first Christmas themed anti CCSS article. That’s right, Dec. 2014 was when I first wrote “Monday Musings” CCSS’s Twelve Pains of Christmas”.

This time last year (2015) we, as anti CCSS Warriors, were still reeling from the passage of ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) as the ‘new’ education law of the land.

edgrinch
The irony? Between that 2014 version and the 2015 version, not a whole heck of a lot had changed, as far as federal overreach in education and/or the grasp the CCSS Machine had on education.

So, here we are approaching Christmas 2016 as anti CCSS/ESSA Warriors. Are the 12 Pains of Common Core the same?! Let’s see:

christmastreereality

2014’s first Pain was “Illegality”, meaning the CCSS wasn’t based on proper vetting or legislation. In 2015, we saw the ‘illegality’ continue with the passage of ESSA. It simply extended the criminal-worthy actions. In 2016, we’ve begun to see just HOW those illegally based education laws are harming our nation.

The 2nd pain? “Deception”. How have we seen that play out in 2016? I just published an article detailing the deceptions.
See: https://commoncorediva.wordpress.com/2016/12/14/the-delusion-games/

Coming in at #3? “Sacrificing quality for conformity”. This particular pain has only increased in the amount of agony it is causing everyone opposed to the federally led overreaches in education. Quality education is continually being laid upon an altar to be sacrificed. The replacement? Conformed workforce based skills.

Back in 2014, I stated that the 4th pain was ‘facts that lie’. Thanks to the powerful CCSS Machine members and the organizations, subjective research (aka: best practices) has been churned out at record speed. This one pain by itself is enough to keep any researcher busy for years. In 2016, we’ve seen many true facts surface about how painful the CCSS education is. We’ve also seen these ‘true facts’ pretty much ignored. So, in 2017, we need to make this pain an area of focus.

Pains 5 through 8 are largely due to the 9th pain of CCSS.
Pain #5 was “Profits” made by undeserving groups/people; related are high (6th pain) stakes (7th) assessments (8th). In 2016, those profits made with anything related to Common Core were enormous. High Stakes Assessments are NOT going away with ESSA!
Therefore, profits are going to be made. Researching the education law as I have, I know that ESSA increases the opportunities for not only the assessments to be even more high stakes, but the companies associated with the assessments to be more involved in education. So, what is the 9th pain?! “Public-private partnerships”!

In 2014, I shared  with you that Pains 10, 11, and 12 were the most tragic of all.
Killing (10th)  Great (11th) Minds (12th). “No matter if it is the student in the school, the staff at the school, or the community at large, we all lose greatness when CCSS is allowed to continue. We lose valuable minds by continuing to see CCSS and all that goes with it grow. We’ve literally seen how the outcomes can kill some kids. Throw in how CCSS has killed a love for learning; killed the importance of reading for fun; killed the rich and storied history of not just our world, but of our nation.” In 2016, we’ve seen great minds killed with ESSA.

CCSS,Not worthy of anything more than a lump of hard, cold, and dirty coal.

The biggest painful factor of all (to me) is that only the names of what harms our nation in education have changed, NOT the agenda.

If you’d like to see the original 2014 Pains with the updated 2015 introduction:
https://commoncorediva.wordpress.com/2014/12/15/monday-musings-ccsss-twelve-pains-of-christmas/

Closing:

Warriors, as I did in 2015, I will be taking a break from writing, but NOT researching. From Dec. 16th to Jan. 6th, no new articles will appear here. I can still be reached via Facebook (Common Core Diva page or U.S. Parent Call to Action), Twitter (@commoncorediva), or MeWe (Lynne M Taylor).

I wish each and every one of you a blessed time with your families in whatever celebrations or festivities you partake of. Here, at my house, we will celebrating Christmas. As always, I am so honored to be a part of your lives. See you in 2017.

The Delusion Games

Anti CCSS Warriors and those Against the CCSS Machine, have you seen the delusions of grandeur being manufactured at almost break neck speed lately?!

Between the stacked deck of pro CCSS folks being tagged for leadership and the main stream media cranking out plenty of false positives about education, it’s enough to make our heads spin.

For example, recently Tom VanderArk’s “Getting Smart” website shared a guest written article about personalized learning in the classroom. Now, if you’ve heard of Mr. VanderArk, you know he is a master deceiver when it comes to a quality education. He’s absolutely, 100% sold out to the CCSS Machine’s reform. Part of the reoccurring message he (and others like him) shares is how fantastic ‘personalized’ learning is.

What these deceivers don’t count on is that we, the Warriors, are onto their delusions. “Personalized” learning in the “Era of ESSA” is code for ‘competency based education designed to NOT teach, but to CONFORM’.

“Personalized” learning is also code for digitally based data mining. “Personalized” learning is also being used to create false positive results when it comes to assessing how much our students are learning. Put another way, the digital based ‘personalization’ constantly grades on a steep curve.

In this context, the CCSS Machine banks on the fact that the general population HEARS ‘personalized’ as ‘custom’. It banks on the fact that when we hear ‘custom’, we PERCEIVE it as ‘exclusive’.

As a society, we are taught that ‘exclusive’ is special, is to be sought after. That somehow ‘exclusive’ means BETTER than everything else.

We are taught that by having something ‘exclusively’ means we have something NO ONE else can have.

Warriors, ‘personalized learning’ via ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) is a masterful delusion of epic proportions. ESSA also has a tremendous amount of Competency Based teaching/learning. ‘Personalizing’ it mocks true teaching/learning.

EVERY student will have the same type of education, there is NO true “personalization”! Only illusions.

As long as education is funneled through competency based Common Core/Career Tech Education/College and Career Readiness and all that goes with it, the delusions live on.

 

The Article:

“Getting Smart” featured  a letter to the President-elect/new administration written by a KnowledgeWorks staff member, Lillian Pace. Warriors, KnowledgeWorks is another 100% sold out to the CCSS Machine member organization. I’ve researched them in the past and have shared with you how deeply their allegiance to the education reform runs. This group is not after our students aligning, it is after our ENTIRE communities being aligned to conformity based education, life, and everything connecting the two. Below is a screen shot from one of my 2014 articles. This was the first one I wrote about KnowledgeWorks (KW).

14kw

To access the entire article: https://commoncorediva.wordpress.com/2014/10/24/fom-friday-knowledgeworks-or-knowledge-quirks/

A big selling point for ‘personalized’ learning is digital badging, or coding. To see how KnowledgeWorks has been involved in this:
https://commoncorediva.wordpress.com/2015/05/04/monday-musings-learning-for-whom/

So, What Did Ms. Pace Direct To Mr. Trump’s Attention?

The link to “Getting Smart”, where her article is featured:
http://www.gettingsmart.com/2016/12/how-the-president-elect-can-scale-personalized-learning/

The link to the 5 page document KnowledgeWorks has created for the President-elect and his administration:
http://www.knowledgeworks.org/sites/default/files/knowledgeworks-recommendations-new-presidential-administration-2016.pdf

The Deluded Sales Pitch Points:
a) leverage the vast amount of innovation occurring across the country to help States and school districts build an education system that provides all learners with access to a personalized education that enables them to master the knowledge and skills critical to success in college and career
How did KW propose the President-elect and his staff accomplish this?! MORE incentives! As if Race to the Top’s incentives didn’t teach our nation about how badly the carrots-on-a-stick delusion worked.

b) Post-secondary Transition Innovation Funds where the money would be “administered jointly by all Department offices with a stake in K–12 and post-secondary policy

c) Create a Pathway Program for employment.While WIOA (Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act) already ‘gave’ us ‘personalized learning for employment’ (Career Tech Education, Career Pathways, Career Tracks, Career Clusters, American Apprenticeships, etc.), this NEW  Pathway “would have the “federal government and the employer would equally share the cost of tuition; however, the federal government would reimburse the employer if it employs an individual for two years after obtaining a credential.”

d) Increase dual enrollment and early college high schools. Warriors, each of these are already ‘personalized’ to not only WIOA, but  to CCSS, CTE, and will increase via ESSA! We do not need MORE of what has already been passed into law. The same can be said for Points A, B, and C!

Closing:

If you’d like to see the slick CBE (Competency Based Education) ‘personalized’ learning sales pitch KnowledgeWorks has produced to help our nation see how valuable it is.Listen for the key educratic buzzwords, as well, Warriors. Especially ‘every child succeeds’.:

If you’d like to see how KnowledgeWorks is ready to help every school, every teacher, and every student transition to CBEhttp://www.knowledgeworks.org/schools/cbe

Principled Leadership in the ESSA Era

Source: A recent NASSP webinar slide. The added emphasis is mine.
Source: A recent NASSP webinar slide. The added emphasis is mine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warriors Against the Core! A call to action is before us. The question is, will we continue to see the CCSS (Common Core State Standards) Machine spew deceptive principles right before us OR we will expose them quickly, mightily, and with purpose?! With the ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) in full creation/implementation mode, the deceptions are flying at us a break neck speed. We can’t afford to miss them. For truth to win, we must be sharp!

The Deceptive Catch?! (Oh yes, there are several, in fact)

Profit. Your state or school district pays the money to access these supposed helpful resources. The supplier, in turn, sells more to other states and school districts. The supplier’s bottom line gets bigger and your freedom of choice gets smaller. Nice bait and switch, isn’t it?! However, the suppliers are not done with your state or school district yet…Besides profit, the others are: data (to be collected, sold, shared, and used against each other for more profit/gain), ESSA mandates in what is taught and how it is taught (not choices), workforce agenda (not true academics for students or teachers), entire community assessments (if your community doesn’t measure up, there will be more ‘helpful resources’ available..of course for a price!), and family interventions (The CCSS Machine’s agenda is NOT family togetherness)!

Warriors, in this age of cyber meetings, expect the following to continue to happen:
1) More deceptions disguised as helpful resources.
2) More data/technology systems will be out soon and available for purchase.
3) More and more webinars will be churned out in the name of adhering to the ESSA.
4) More meetings geared for school leaders to adhere to the ESSA.
5) We will continue to expose it all!!!

The Screenshot Above:

The graphic I made for you is a perfect illustration of the ‘happy to deceive you’ tactics so ripe and in use by the CCSS Machine. This one happens to be a recent webinar (3/23/16) slide hosted by the NASSP (National Association of Secondary School Principals)


The NASSP is no exception. How do I know? I have researched this group before. Sen. Lamar Alexander bragged on them, in fact, when he gloated after the ESSA passed AND Dr. King was confirmed. In fact, all those groups Alexander mentioned are busy churning out webinars, emails, tweets, and any other type of ESSA alignment hype. It is almost laughable how each one is saying THEIR information is the ‘most accurate’ about ESSA ‘really means’!

So, what did the NASSP have to spin eloquent about concerning the ESSA? Title One funding. However, the NASSP was not alone in this presentation. The Learning First Alliance (another pro CCSS group) had a guest speaker featured in the webinar. He also claimed to have great insight into all things Title One. (To access the Alliancehttp://www.learningfirst.org/)

Here are some other need to know anti CCSS Warrior items from the webinar:

1) College and Career Readiness is purposefully inserted in the ESSA and contain 3 levels of achievement. The CCR will also mandatorily have to meet CTE (Career Technical Education) and post-secondary public college/university requirements.

2) The U.S. Dept. of Education has a new pilot program out for up to 7 states to become a part of. Stated as the ‘Innovative Assessment and Accountability Demo Project’. However, I did not find a project with this name on the U.S. Dept. of Education’s website. I did happen to find another pro CCSS media spin on the Project, “…the law also includes a pilot program that initially allows up to seven states to develop innovative assessment systems—such as competency-based assessments and instructionally embedded assessments—that provide valid, reliable, and comparable data on student achievement. States approved for this program can pilot these innovative assessment systems in a few districts before implementing them statewide.” (Source: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education/report/2016/01/29/130115/implementing-the-every-student-succeeds-act/)
What this means for us: those schools in the approved states will be experimental yet again for education reform purposes. Those presenting during the webinar said that many, many more states (besides the allotted 7) are lining up to participate. (*Related to this is what the U.S. Dept. of Ed has on file about assessments:
http://tech.ed.gov/netp/assessment-measure-what-matters/)

3) How much Title One funding our states will receive will be based on the past 3 years of student data. Funding will be doled out on two dates in 2016: July 1st, and October 1st. The states will receive money based on the child count per district as well as the poverty rate. These figures are taken from your county’s (or parish’s) data.

4) Gone will be the Yearly Annual Progress tracking and 100% graduation rates. Supposedly states will get to set all the parameters, at least according to the hosts. What is also being debated is which national assessment to used as the high school requirement…it will be either the SAT or the ACT (both, just happen to be aligned to CCSS!)

5) More high schools could get Title One funding, thanks to the ESSA. This change would allow more students to be included in all those supportive success activities and programs ESSA is full of. The Title One funding states get must go for development of school wide programs/services and can be used for dual enrolled or concurrently enrolled students.

6) According to the webinar, the ESSA will be updated in about 5 years and completely replaces NCLB, No Child Left Behind(funny, another pro CCSS webinar I attended and shared the results said NCLB was largely in place via the ESSA). I guess this happens when you deceive folks so much you get lost in the lies!

7) Because of possible shifts in Title One funding from ‘targeted assistance’ to ‘school wide’, you will need to see what school districts consider as capital purchases. The example given: laptops for each student (as long as they are $500.00 or less) qualify as capital purchases. The U.S. Dept. of Ed is ‘encouraging’ states to use ‘school wide services/programs’ to avoid the technicalities of ESSA.

 8) NASSP wants to be a top influencer in the ESSA changes we face. Expect this wish from all the others clamoring for our attention with ESSA changes.

9) States MUST submit Title One plans to the U.S. Dept. of Education in a timely manner. Meaningful consultative results MUST also be presented. The consultative process will involve all ‘stakeholders’ in education AND have to co-ordinate with all other educational programs the states use/plan to use. Since there is no set consulting process yet, this means we have an opportunity to become involved in defining what the process will look like!!

10)The NASSP shared that most State Boards of Education do not contain a full staff of professionals, it is important to get as many professional education-minded people in place. Another opportunity for us to get as many anti CCSS professionally minded education Warriors in place!

To access the entire Webinar slide set: nasspwebaddy

Other Webinars we Warriors should make plans to attend:

NASSP’s Title Two (will target educator funding), April 27, 2016 and the Title 4 (Block grants for States and education) for 21st Century Community Schools, May 4, 2016. Both will be held Eastern Daylight Time (3:30 pm to 4:30 pm). You can sign up for these by using the same address included in the screen shot above.

Be sure to check EdWeek’s website. This Gates Foundation backed group is also busy churning out deceptions with the ESSA.

ASCD is featuring many pro ESSA resources right now in preparation for their upcoming conference. (ASCD is also backed by the Gates Foundation).

Not a webinar, but a date we can use to counter act the pro ESSA lies the NEA will be spinning: April 3rd, 2016. Look to your local NEA chapters for news on this.

Closing:

All this deception reminds me of some lyrics from a song I first heard last year. Sung by a British artist named Paloma Faith, the song is titled ‘Do You Want the Truth or Something Beautiful’?  While written as a love song, it is my opinion that those in the CCSS Machine live this out daily:

‘Do you want the truth or something beautiful?
Just close your eyes and make believe
Do you want the truth or something beautiful?
I am happy to deceive you’

So much for principled leadership, huh?

 

RMT Sunday: CCSS, Snake Oil of our Time

1926825_232231733648003_955489105_n

When this graphic first came across my Facebook feed, I instantly ‘grabbed’ it. It says so much of what I’ve found to be true about Common Core! “Restore Oklahoma Public Education” created this graphic, by the way.

Background:

If you’re not aware of the fact, I’ve been researching the national grab for educational standards since 2009. So, I know it’s not a new thing to want to control our students. Those following educational timeline historical events in America, know this latest ‘grab’ is not the first, and more than likely won’t be the last. So, since it’s “Riddle Me This Sunday”, WHY has there been such a movement in US education?

Better yet, what can we, the citizens, opposed to such movement do to STOP it?

Research:

From the PDF file found in Charlotte Iserbyt’s “American Deception Site Files,  Part 2”, Harold Rugg’s book, “Foundations of American Education”, published in 1947 in Great Britain. Mr. Rugg documented all kinds of infomation centered on science from human interest viewpoint. Main interest? Why we think the way we do, why we learn the way we do, etc. It’s a fascinating read and I do NOT want to spoil it. Yes, it’s an old document. Some may say it’s so old, it’s irrelevant. However, I disagree with that thought. It is by looking at these old documents we can better understand the basis for which things like a national grab for education are founded on. Find this document and the rest of Charlotte’s work at her website, http://www.americandeception.com/index.php?page=home

Excerpt from the “Foundations of American Education”:

“A half-century of research has produced an important body of concepts for the new education . Summing them up :
– the characteristics of science and the concepts of the scientific method are now an indispensable part of the reconstruction of education; some of its concepts will be taken from the separate foundations of biopsychology, sociology, esthetics, and ethics ; basic to them all are such super-primary concepts as field-force-energy and the principle of organization .
– in building education in a thoroughly sensate culture we must distinguish the postulates of mechanism from those of organism;
we are dealing with the world of organism.
– administrative functions, that can properly be evaluated by rank order methods, must be distinguished from those in which
the growth of the individual and the development of the Person are the aim ; in the latter, rank-order methods have only limited applications at best .
– the special contribution of the quantitative movement has been the building of instruments with which to measure the raw materials of personality, aptitudes, attitudes, and the products of education.
– instruments of considerable validity and reliability are now available with which to measure acts of habit, the skills and knowledge
outcomes of the school ; the psychological groundwork has also been laid for building correspondingly efficient yardsticks for acts of thought (problem-solving thinking and the like)
the efforts to measure the creative and appreciative acts have, to the present moment, been marked by little more than failure ;
the philosophic, psychological, and esthetic orientation of the FIFTY YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD measurers is totally inadequate for the appraisal of human expression ; here a completely new beginning must be made and this can be done only by a new expressional orientation .
-we must distinguish performance, ability, and capacity . We measure performance, infer ability from the average of measured performances, and estimate capacity from the cumulation of the latter.
basic principles for the design of mental-measuring instruments are emerging ; in validation we see now that the practical criterion is of primary importance and that this resides in actual personal or vocational adjustment of the individual.
– factorial validity is of equal importance ; critical and experimental study of general vs . specific traits has established the rich variability of human personality, revealing it as a complex of many group factors, integrated with a welter of specific abilities.
– similarly the concept of reliability has been clarified, the former single crude statistical coefficient of reliability being replaced by several more specific ones .
– a cautious attitude has developed concerning the early tendency to measure maturity by means of age – mental, educational, etc. ; the present tendency is to avoid composite “achievement ages” and to emphasize “subject ages .”
– test construction and interpretation tend to emphasize the use of standard scores and of other variability measures; for example,
the “Deviation IQ” is being offered as a more reliable measure of “brightness” than the Ratio IQ .
– we now distinguish clearly between “evaluation” and “measurement”; a vast body of critical appraisal of the evaluation of
personality is now available and good beginnings in measurement of its three raw materials – physique, temperament, and intelligence.
– the group mental ability test can now be said to stand on its own scientific foundations of design principles, validity, and reliability.
marked success has been achieved in building aptitude tests – either trade, military, or scholastic ; especially established by the achievement of the psychological profession during World War II.”

National Science Foundation's role in Research/Development of CCSS.
National Science Foundation’s role in Research/Development of CCSS.

National Science Foundation:

What do you know about this mighty arm of our federal government? Why would I use ‘mighty arm of our government’? Look at its position in relationship to the White House, the Cabinet. Look at its funding. Look at its mission. Science is the common link between the past and the present, folks! If not, WHY is so much effort in embedding STEM into Common Core? Why so much focus on the mind mind? In a word? ‘control’.

This word, ‘control’ is the common link in most things connected to CCSS and education. If I can better understand your mind, I can better manipulate IF I so choose to do so. Guess what? The Common Core Machine has proven over and over again..it is choosing to do so! In the graphic above you see the NSF and CCSS are most definitely connnected. Here’s the rest of the document for you to have. (http://www.gohnow.com/goh/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EHRAC_CCSS_FINAL1.pdf) If you cannot access the rest of the pdf, here’s the final question asked of the reader of the NSF/CCSS report, “Beyond the CCSS—How might NSF/EHR leverage the CCSS initiative to help achieve excellence in STEM education at all levels and in all settings by 2035?”

*note EHR stands for Education and Human Resources

Also noteworthy:

‘NSF is also able to  be  well-positioned to support innovative research and development efforts on alignment, implementation, impact, and ongoing improvement of the CCSS.
 Existing programs/initiatives (e.g., ATE, DR K-12, ISE, ITEST, MSP, NSDL, REESE, and TSL), cross-directorate initiatives such as SEES, and future initiatives such as TLF can be leveraged in the short term to promote catalytic research and development efforts at little or no additional cost.’

Current Nat'l Science Foundation work for CCSS includes professional development (for the teachers, leaders), infrastructure (computers, software), research (as in mind, education, etc.) and assessments (tests that measure)
Current Nat’l Science Foundation work for CCSS includes professional development (for the teachers, leaders), infrastructure (computers, software), research (as in mind, education, etc.) and assessments (tests that measure)

So, how do you fight the CCSS Machine? 

Consistent pellets of truth, is one way. Leave a comment on this post as to how you have fought the CCSS Machine. I look forward to seeing what you can share. Who knows how it can go on to help others in our collective fight to preserve our students minds from the overreach of our government.

Oh wait, how is NSF linked to the US Government? ‘The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency created by Congress in 1950  “to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense…” With an annual budget of $7.2 billion (FY 2014), we are the funding source for approximately 24 percent of all federally supported basic research conducted by America’s colleges and universities. In many fields such as mathematics, computer science and the social sciences, NSF is the major source of federal backing.’ See more: 

http://www.nsf.gov/about/glance.jsp)